Commit 19ec166c authored by Christian Borntraeger's avatar Christian Borntraeger Committed by Paolo Bonzini
Browse files

KVM: s390: fix memory slot handling for KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION



kselftests exposed a problem in the s390 handling for memory slots.
Right now we only do proper memory slot handling for creation of new
memory slots. Neither MOVE, nor DELETION are handled properly. Let us
implement those.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
parent 2924b521
......@@ -4524,21 +4524,28 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
const struct kvm_memory_slot *new,
enum kvm_mr_change change)
{
int rc;
/* If the basics of the memslot do not change, we do not want
* to update the gmap. Every update causes several unnecessary
* segment translation exceptions. This is usually handled just
* fine by the normal fault handler + gmap, but it will also
* cause faults on the prefix page of running guest CPUs.
*/
if (old->userspace_addr == mem->userspace_addr &&
old->base_gfn * PAGE_SIZE == mem->guest_phys_addr &&
old->npages * PAGE_SIZE == mem->memory_size)
return;
int rc = 0;
rc = gmap_map_segment(kvm->arch.gmap, mem->userspace_addr,
mem->guest_phys_addr, mem->memory_size);
switch (change) {
case KVM_MR_DELETE:
rc = gmap_unmap_segment(kvm->arch.gmap, old->base_gfn * PAGE_SIZE,
old->npages * PAGE_SIZE);
break;
case KVM_MR_MOVE:
rc = gmap_unmap_segment(kvm->arch.gmap, old->base_gfn * PAGE_SIZE,
old->npages * PAGE_SIZE);
if (rc)
break;
/* FALLTHROUGH */
case KVM_MR_CREATE:
rc = gmap_map_segment(kvm->arch.gmap, mem->userspace_addr,
mem->guest_phys_addr, mem->memory_size);
break;
case KVM_MR_FLAGS_ONLY:
break;
default:
WARN(1, "Unknown KVM MR CHANGE: %d\n", change);
}
if (rc)
pr_warn("failed to commit memory region\n");
return;
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment