• Alexey Brodkin's avatar
    initcall: add explicit hint if initcall was relocated · e38d1cb2
    Alexey Brodkin authored
    Commit "initcall: Improve debugging support" makes sense and indeed
    simplifies process of matching initcalls executed with static
    Until you are debugging relocation functionality.
    Existign output may make you think that at some point execution somehow
    returned back to non-relocated area. And there're many reasons/problems
    that may provoke this behavior.
    In order to make things clear let's add explicit mention in case initall
    was actually relocated like this:
    initcall: 810015f8
    Relocation Offset is: 0efcf000
    Relocating to 8ffcf000, new gd at 8fdced3c, sp at 8fdced20
    initcall: 810015b8
    initcall: 8ffd093c
    initcall: 8ffd0a14
    initcall: 81001940 (relocated to 8ffd0940)
    initcall: 81001958 (relocated to 8ffd0958)
    Note "unexpected" jump from 0x8f... area to 0x81... area.
    Without explanation this raises many questions: execution jumped in
    relocated area right as expected and then for some reason returned back?
    But I hope comment in brackets will save some time for those curious
    developers who are careful enough to catch "unexpected jump to pre-reloc
    area" or those unlucky ones who'll have to deal with relocation
    Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
    Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
    Cc: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
initcall.c 815 Bytes