Commit 35dd055b authored by Łukasz Majewski's avatar Łukasz Majewski Committed by Tom Rini

fs:ext4:cleanup: Remove superfluous code

Code responsible for handling situation when ext4 has block size of 1024B
can be ordered to take less space.

This patch does that for ext4 common and write files.
Signed-off-by: default avatarLukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
parent ae95fad5
......@@ -904,10 +904,8 @@ long int ext4fs_get_new_blk_no(void)
restart:
fs->curr_blkno++;
/* get the blockbitmap index respective to blockno */
if (fs->blksz != 1024) {
bg_idx = fs->curr_blkno / blk_per_grp;
} else {
bg_idx = fs->curr_blkno / blk_per_grp;
bg_idx = fs->curr_blkno / blk_per_grp;
if (fs->blksz == 1024) {
remainder = fs->curr_blkno % blk_per_grp;
if (!remainder)
bg_idx--;
......
......@@ -116,10 +116,8 @@ static void delete_single_indirect_block(struct ext2_inode *inode)
if (inode->b.blocks.indir_block != 0) {
debug("SIPB releasing %u\n", inode->b.blocks.indir_block);
blknr = inode->b.blocks.indir_block;
if (fs->blksz != 1024) {
bg_idx = blknr / blk_per_grp;
} else {
bg_idx = blknr / blk_per_grp;
bg_idx = blknr / blk_per_grp;
if (fs->blksz == 1024) {
remainder = blknr % blk_per_grp;
if (!remainder)
bg_idx--;
......@@ -181,11 +179,9 @@ static void delete_double_indirect_block(struct ext2_inode *inode)
break;
debug("DICB releasing %u\n", *di_buffer);
if (fs->blksz != 1024) {
bg_idx = (*di_buffer) / blk_per_grp;
} else {
bg_idx = (*di_buffer) / blk_per_grp;
remainder = (*di_buffer) % blk_per_grp;
bg_idx = *di_buffer / blk_per_grp;
if (fs->blksz == 1024) {
remainder = *di_buffer % blk_per_grp;
if (!remainder)
bg_idx--;
}
......@@ -213,10 +209,8 @@ static void delete_double_indirect_block(struct ext2_inode *inode)
/* removing the parent double indirect block */
blknr = inode->b.blocks.double_indir_block;
if (fs->blksz != 1024) {
bg_idx = blknr / blk_per_grp;
} else {
bg_idx = blknr / blk_per_grp;
bg_idx = blknr / blk_per_grp;
if (fs->blksz == 1024) {
remainder = blknr % blk_per_grp;
if (!remainder)
bg_idx--;
......@@ -293,12 +287,9 @@ static void delete_triple_indirect_block(struct ext2_inode *inode)
for (j = 0; j < fs->blksz / sizeof(int); j++) {
if (*tip_buffer == 0)
break;
if (fs->blksz != 1024) {
bg_idx = (*tip_buffer) / blk_per_grp;
} else {
bg_idx = (*tip_buffer) / blk_per_grp;
remainder = (*tip_buffer) % blk_per_grp;
bg_idx = *tip_buffer / blk_per_grp;
if (fs->blksz == 1024) {
remainder = *tip_buffer % blk_per_grp;
if (!remainder)
bg_idx--;
}
......@@ -336,12 +327,9 @@ static void delete_triple_indirect_block(struct ext2_inode *inode)
* removing the grand parent blocks
* which is connected to inode
*/
if (fs->blksz != 1024) {
bg_idx = (*tigp_buffer) / blk_per_grp;
} else {
bg_idx = (*tigp_buffer) / blk_per_grp;
remainder = (*tigp_buffer) % blk_per_grp;
bg_idx = *tigp_buffer / blk_per_grp;
if (fs->blksz == 1024) {
remainder = *tigp_buffer % blk_per_grp;
if (!remainder)
bg_idx--;
}
......@@ -371,10 +359,8 @@ static void delete_triple_indirect_block(struct ext2_inode *inode)
/* removing the grand parent triple indirect block */
blknr = inode->b.blocks.triple_indir_block;
if (fs->blksz != 1024) {
bg_idx = blknr / blk_per_grp;
} else {
bg_idx = blknr / blk_per_grp;
bg_idx = blknr / blk_per_grp;
if (fs->blksz == 1024) {
remainder = blknr % blk_per_grp;
if (!remainder)
bg_idx--;
......@@ -452,10 +438,8 @@ static int ext4fs_delete_file(int inodeno)
for (i = 0; i < no_blocks; i++) {
blknr = read_allocated_block(&(node_inode->inode), i);
if (fs->blksz != 1024) {
bg_idx = blknr / blk_per_grp;
} else {
bg_idx = blknr / blk_per_grp;
bg_idx = blknr / blk_per_grp;
if (fs->blksz == 1024) {
remainder = blknr % blk_per_grp;
if (!remainder)
bg_idx--;
......@@ -499,10 +483,8 @@ static int ext4fs_delete_file(int inodeno)
no_blocks++;
for (i = 0; i < no_blocks; i++) {
blknr = read_allocated_block(&inode, i);
if (fs->blksz != 1024) {
bg_idx = blknr / blk_per_grp;
} else {
bg_idx = blknr / blk_per_grp;
bg_idx = blknr / blk_per_grp;
if (fs->blksz == 1024) {
remainder = blknr % blk_per_grp;
if (!remainder)
bg_idx--;
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment