• Sergey Senozhatsky's avatar
    s390: use common bust_spinlocks() · 5b39fc04
    Sergey Senozhatsky authored
    s390 is the only architecture that is using own bust_spinlocks()
    variant, while other arch-s seem to be OK with the common
    Heiko Carstens [1] said he would prefer s390 to use the common
    bust_spinlocks() as well:
      I did some code archaeology and this function is unchanged since ~17
      years. When it was introduced it was close to identical to the x86
      variant. All other architectures use the common code variant in the
      meantime. So if we change this I'd prefer that we switch s390 to the
      common code variant as well. Right now I can't see a reason for not
      doing that
    This patch removes s390 bust_spinlocks() and drops the weak attribute
    from the common bust_spinlocks() version.
    [1] lkml.kernel.org/r/20181025062800.GB4037@osiris
    Signed-off-by: default avatarSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>