udf_fill_super() used udf_parse_options() to flag UDF_FLAG_BLOCKSIZE_SET
when blocksize was specified otherwise used 512 bytes
(bdev_logical_block_size) and 2048 bytes (UDF_DEFAULT_BLOCKSIZE)
IOW both 1024 and 4096 specifications were required or resulted in

"mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop1"

This patch loops through different block values but also updates
udf_load_vrs() to return -EINVAL instead of 0 when udf_check_vsd()
fails (and uopt->novrs = 0).
The later being the reason for the RFC; we have that case when mounting
a 4kb blocksize against other values but maybe VRS is not mandatory
there ?

Tested with 512, 1024, 2048 and 4096 blocksize

Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>