Commit 3aa02cb6 authored by Takashi Iwai's avatar Takashi Iwai

ALSA: pcm : Call kill_fasync() in stream lock

Currently kill_fasync() is called outside the stream lock in
snd_pcm_period_elapsed().  This is potentially racy, since the stream
may get released even during the irq handler is running.  Although
snd_pcm_release_substream() calls snd_pcm_drop(), this doesn't
guarantee that the irq handler finishes, thus the kill_fasync() call
outside the stream spin lock may be invoked after the substream is
detached, as recently reported by KASAN.

As a quick workaround, move kill_fasync() call inside the stream
lock.  The fasync is rarely used interface, so this shouldn't have a
big impact from the performance POV.

Ideally, we should implement some sync mechanism for the proper finish
of stream and irq handler.  But this oneliner should suffice for most
cases, so far.
Reported-by: default avatarBaozeng Ding <sploving1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
parent fa44b7ec
......@@ -1886,8 +1886,8 @@ void snd_pcm_period_elapsed(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
snd_timer_interrupt(substream->timer, 1);
#endif
_end:
snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irqrestore(substream, flags);
kill_fasync(&runtime->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irqrestore(substream, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(snd_pcm_period_elapsed);
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment