-
Dave Chinner authored
When a corrupt inode is detected during xfs_iflush_cluster, we can get a shutdown ASSERT failure like this: XFS (pmem1): Metadata corruption detected at xfs_symlink_shortform_verify+0x5c/0xa0, inode 0x86627 data fork XFS (pmem1): Unmount and run xfs_repair XFS (pmem1): xfs_do_force_shutdown(0x8) called from line 3372 of file fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c. Return address = ffffffff814f4116 XFS (pmem1): Corruption of in-memory data detected. Shutting down filesystem XFS (pmem1): xfs_do_force_shutdown(0x1) called from line 222 of file fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c. Return address = ffffffff814a8a88 XFS (pmem1): xfs_do_force_shutdown(0x1) called from line 222 of file fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c. Return address = ffffffff814a8ef9 XFS (pmem1): Please umount the filesystem and rectify the problem(s) XFS: Assertion failed: xfs_isiflocked(ip), file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h, line: 258 ..... Call Trace: xfs_iflush_abort+0x10a/0x110 xfs_iflush+0xf3/0x390 xfs_inode_item_push+0x126/0x1e0 xfsaild+0x2c5/0x890 kthread+0x11c/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 Essentially, xfs_iflush_abort() has been called twice on the original inode that that was flushed. This happens because the inode has been flushed to teh buffer successfully via xfs_iflush_int(), and so when another inode is detected as corrupt in xfs_iflush_cluster, the buffer is marked stale and EIO, and iodone callbacks are run on it. Running the iodone callbacks walks across the original inode and calls xfs_iflush_abort() on it. When xfs_iflush_cluster() returns to xfs_iflush(), it runs the error path for that function, and that calls xfs_iflush_abort() on the inode a second time, leading to the above assert failure as the inode is not flush locked anymore. This bug has been there a long time. The simple fix would be to just avoid calling xfs_iflush_abort() in xfs_iflush() if we've got a failure from xfs_iflush_cluster(). However, xfs_iflush_cluster() has magic delwri buffer handling that means it may or may not have run IO completion on the buffer, and hence sometimes we have to call xfs_iflush_abort() from xfs_iflush(), and sometimes we shouldn't. After reading through all the error paths and the delwri buffer code, it's clear that the error handling in xfs_iflush_cluster() is unnecessary. If the buffer is delwri, it leaves it on the delwri list so that when the delwri list is submitted it sees a shutdown fliesystem in xfs_buf_submit() and that marks the buffer stale, EIO and runs IO completion. i.e. exactly what xfs+iflush_cluster() does when it's not a delwri buffer. Further, marking a buffer stale clears the _XBF_DELWRI_Q flag on the buffer, which means when submission of the buffer occurs, it just skips over it and releases it. IOWs, the error handling in xfs_iflush_cluster doesn't need to care if the buffer is already on a the delwri queue or not - it just needs to mark the buffer stale, EIO and run completions. That means we can just use the easy fix for xfs_iflush() to avoid the double abort. Signed-off-by:
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
e53946db