Commit e3d301ca authored by Michal Hocko's avatar Michal Hocko Committed by Linus Torvalds

mm/memblock.c: do not complain about top-down allocations for !MEMORY_HOTREMOVE

Mike Rapoport is converting architectures from bootmem to nobootmem
allocator.  While doing so for m68k Geert has noticed that he gets a
scary looking warning:

  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at mm/memblock.c:230
  memblock_find_in_range_node+0x11c/0x1be
  memblock: bottom-up allocation failed, memory hotunplug may be affected
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted
  4.18.0-rc3-atari-01343-gf2fb5f2e09a97a3c-dirty #7
  Call Trace: __warn+0xa8/0xc2
    kernel_pg_dir+0x0/0x1000
    netdev_lower_get_next+0x2/0x22
    warn_slowpath_fmt+0x2e/0x36
    memblock_find_in_range_node+0x11c/0x1be
    memblock_find_in_range_node+0x11c/0x1be
    memblock_find_in_range_node+0x0/0x1be
    vprintk_func+0x66/0x6e
    memblock_virt_alloc_internal+0xd0/0x156
    netdev_lower_get_next+0x2/0x22
    netdev_lower_get_next+0x2/0x22
    kernel_pg_dir+0x0/0x1000
    memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_nopanic+0x58/0x7a
    netdev_lower_get_next+0x2/0x22
    kernel_pg_dir+0x0/0x1000
    kernel_pg_dir+0x0/0x1000
    EXPTBL+0x234/0x400
    EXPTBL+0x234/0x400
    alloc_node_mem_map+0x4a/0x66
    netdev_lower_get_next+0x2/0x22
    free_area_init_node+0xe2/0x29e
    EXPTBL+0x234/0x400
    paging_init+0x430/0x462
    kernel_pg_dir+0x0/0x1000
    printk+0x0/0x1a
    EXPTBL+0x234/0x400
    setup_arch+0x1b8/0x22c
    start_kernel+0x4a/0x40a
    _sinittext+0x344/0x9e8

The warning is basically saying that a top-down allocation can break
memory hotremove because memblock allocation is not movable.  But m68k
doesn't even support MEMORY_HOTREMOVE so there is no point to warn about
it.

Make the warning conditional only to configurations that care.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180706061750.GH32658@dhcp22.suse.czSigned-off-by: default avatarMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reported-by: default avatarGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Tested-by: default avatarGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Sam Creasey <sammy@sammy.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 24962af7
......@@ -227,7 +227,8 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t size,
* so we use WARN_ONCE() here to see the stack trace if
* fail happens.
*/
WARN_ONCE(1, "memblock: bottom-up allocation failed, memory hotunplug may be affected\n");
WARN_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE),
"memblock: bottom-up allocation failed, memory hotremove may be affected\n");
}
return __memblock_find_range_top_down(start, end, size, align, nid,
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment