Commit a5c9161f authored by H. Peter Anvin's avatar H. Peter Anvin

x86, atomic64: In selftest, distinguish x86-64 from 586+

The x86-64 implementation of the atomics is totally different from the
i586+ implementation, which makes it quite confusing to call it
"586+".  Also fix indentation, and add "i" for "i386" and "i586" as
used elsewhere in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: default avatarH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Luca Barbieri <luca@luca-barbieri.com>
LKML-Reference: <1267005265-27958-4-git-send-email-luca@luca-barbieri.com>
parent f3e83131
......@@ -144,14 +144,16 @@ static __init int test_atomic64(void)
BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86
printk(KERN_INFO "atomic64 test passed for %s+ platform %s CX8 and %s SSE\n",
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG64
"586",
printk(KERN_INFO "atomic64 test passed for %s platform %s CX8 and %s SSE\n",
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
"x86-64",
#elif defined(CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG64)
"i586+",
#else
"386",
"i386+",
#endif
boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CX8) ? "with" : "without",
boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XMM) ? "with" : "without");
boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CX8) ? "with" : "without",
boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XMM) ? "with" : "without");
#else
printk(KERN_INFO "atomic64 test passed\n");
#endif
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment