... | ... | @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ The following benchmarks indicate how the Librem 5 performs compared to other ha |
|
|
↑ Benchmark where higher is better.
|
|
|
↓ Benchmark where lower is better.
|
|
|
glmark2-es2-wayland was compiled without the “terrain” scene (which isn’t able to run on the PinePhone).
|
|
|
† Raspbian doesn't support Wayland, so glmark2-es2 was run in X11, which is slower. Due to a [bug](https://github.com/glmark2/glmark2/issues/124) in glmark2 with the Raspberry Pi 4B, it was compiled without the "texture", "windows", "terrain", "shadow" and "refract" scenes, so the Raspberry Pi score should be treated with caution when comparing to other devices.
|
|
|
† Raspbian doesn't support Wayland, so glmark2-es2 was run in X11, which is slower than Wayland. Due to a [bug](https://github.com/glmark2/glmark2/issues/124) in glmark2 with the RPi4B, it was compiled without the "texture", "windows", "terrain", "shadow" and "refract" scenes, but the removal of these scenes probably didn't have much impact on the RPi4B's glmark2-es2 score, since the Thinkpad T450s scored almost the same with or without these scenes included.
|
|
|
**Sources:** [hardinfo](https://github.com/lpereira/hardinfo/) and [glmark2](https://github.com/glmark2/glmark2) tests by Sebastian Krzyszkowiak (https://dosowisko.net/bench/) and Amos Batto (https://github.com/amosbatto/benchmarks). See the [forum discussion](https://forums.puri.sm/t/still-no-dogwood/10034/55) about the tests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Information about the benchmarks:**
|
... | ... | |