... | @@ -9,7 +9,19 @@ The following benchmarks indicate how the Librem 5 performs compared to other ha |
... | @@ -9,7 +9,19 @@ The following benchmarks indicate how the Librem 5 performs compared to other ha |
|
| ↑ CPU Zlib | 0.51 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.11 | -19% | -127% | 91% |
|
|
| ↑ CPU Zlib | 0.51 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.11 | -19% | -127% | 91% |
|
|
| ↓ FPU FFT | 1.96 | 5.40 | 9.44 | 14.15 | -75% | -162% | 50% |
|
|
| ↓ FPU FFT | 1.96 | 5.40 | 9.44 | 14.15 | -75% | -162% | 50% |
|
|
| ↓ FPU Raytracing | 1.96 | 2.99 | 4.81 | 7.12 | -61% | -138% | 48% |
|
|
| ↓ FPU Raytracing | 1.96 | 2.99 | 4.81 | 7.12 | -61% | -138% | 48% |
|
|
|
|
|------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|-------|-------|------|
|
|
| ↑ glmark2-es2-wayland| 1967 | 267† | 203 | 84 | -32%† | -218%†| 142% |
|
|
| ↑ glmark2-es2-wayland| 1967 | 267† | 203 | 84 | -32%† | -218%†| 142% |
|
|
|
|
| - build | 2493 | 336 | 467 | 214 | 28% | -57% | 119% |
|
|
|
|
| - shading | 2090 | 294 | 206 | 75 | -43% | -294% | 176% |
|
|
|
|
| - bump | 2110 | 298 | 188 | 57 | -59% | -423% | 230% |
|
|
|
|
| - effect2d | 1820 | 169 | 91 | 27 | -87% | -538% | 242% |
|
|
|
|
| - pulsar | 3168 | 326 | 336 | 210 | 3% | -55% | 60% |
|
|
|
|
| - buffer | 541 | 159 | 129 | 63 | -23% | -153% | 105% |
|
|
|
|
| - ideas | 1519 | 291 | 202 | 59 | -44% | -393% | 242% |
|
|
|
|
| - jellyfish | 2507 | 200 | 79 | 19 | -153% | -953% | 316% |
|
|
|
|
| - conditionals | 2604 | 317 | 239 | 87 | -33% | -265% | 175% |
|
|
|
|
| - function | 2609 | 286 | 124 | 50 | -131% | -471% | 147% |
|
|
|
|
| - loop | 2463 | 261 | 123 | 52 | -112% | -402% | 137% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
↑ Benchmark where higher is better.
|
|
↑ Benchmark where higher is better.
|
|
↓ Benchmark where lower is better.
|
|
↓ Benchmark where lower is better.
|
... | | ... | |