Prioritized Labels
Other Labels
bug
-
Project label
duplicate
-
Project label
enhancement
-
Project label
invalid
-
Project label
question
-
Project label
wontfix
-
Project label
helpwanted
anyone can sign up to work on this issue
-
Group label
needsdesign
This is needs input from the design side
-
Group label
critical
makes unrelated software on the system (or the whole system) break, or causes serious data loss, or introduces a security hole on systems where you install the package
-
Group label
grave
makes the package in question unusable or mostly so, or causes data loss, or introduces a security hole allowing access to the accounts of users who use the package
-
Group label
important
a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without rendering it completely unusable to everyone
-
Group label
minor
a problem which doesn’t affect the package’s usefulness, and is presumably trivial to fix
-
Group label
normal
the default severity value, applicable to most bugs
-
Group label
serious
the package has an issue with licensing (non-free), privacy, or security, or (in the package maintainer’s or release manager’s opinion) makes the package unsuitable for release
-
Group label
wishlist
for any feature request, and also for any bugs that are very difficult to fix due to major design considerations
-
Group label
needsupstreamwork
the issue has an upstream component that will need to be fixed
-
Group label
wontfix
the issue will not be resolved and a reason should be in the comments
-
Group label
fixedupstream
the issue has been fixed upstream but the fix has not trickled down to the Librem 5 project yet
-
Group label
devkit
Issues relating to the Librem 5 development kit
-
Group label
feature
A collection of issues.
-
Group label
Prioritized label