Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Jan 11, 2017
  2. Dec 12, 2016
  3. Dec 11, 2016
  4. Dec 05, 2016
  5. Nov 30, 2016
  6. Nov 26, 2016
  7. Nov 22, 2016
  8. Nov 21, 2016
  9. Nov 20, 2016
  10. Nov 18, 2016
  11. Nov 15, 2016
  12. Nov 13, 2016
  13. Nov 09, 2016
  14. Nov 08, 2016
  15. Nov 07, 2016
  16. Nov 05, 2016
  17. Oct 14, 2016
  18. Oct 12, 2016
  19. Oct 10, 2016
  20. Oct 06, 2016
  21. Oct 03, 2016
  22. Oct 02, 2016
  23. Sep 29, 2016
  24. Sep 26, 2016
  25. Sep 22, 2016
  26. Sep 20, 2016
    • Eugen Rochko's avatar
      Fix #24 - Thread resolving for remote statuses · 4bec6138
      Eugen Rochko authored
      This is a big one, so let me enumerate:
      
      Accounts as well as stream entry pages now contain Link headers that
      reference the Atom feed and Webfinger URL for the former and Atom entry
      for the latter. So you only need to HEAD those resources to get that
      information, no need to download and parse HTML <link>s.
      
      ProcessFeedService will now queue ThreadResolveWorker for each remote
      status that it cannot find otherwise. Furthermore, entries are now
      processed in reverse order (from bottom to top) in case a newer entry
      references a chronologically previous one.
      
      ThreadResolveWorker uses FetchRemoteStatusService to obtain a status
      and attach the child status it was queued for to it.
      
      FetchRemoteStatusService looks up the URL, first with a HEAD, tests
      if it's an Atom feed, in which case it processes it directly. Next
      for Link headers to the Atom feed, in which case that is fetched
      and processed. Lastly if it's HTML, it is checked for <link>s to the Atom
      feed, and if such is found, that is fetched and processed. The account for
      the status is derived from author/name attribute in the XML and the hostname
      in the URL (domain). FollowRemoteAccountService and ProcessFeedService
      are used.
      
      This means that potentially threads are resolved recursively until a dead-end
      is encountered, however it is performed asynchronously over background jobs,
      so it should be ok.
      4bec6138
  27. Sep 19, 2016
  28. Sep 18, 2016
Loading